← all questions · Is it worth it · Basic Physician Training (Adult Internal Medicine) guide
Partly. The exams are real but the pass rates are good — RACP quotes a five-year mean of 78% on the written and the 2026 clinical ran 83.0% 12. The genuine complaint is the med-reg job in an understaffed hospital, plus the advanced-training bottleneck afterwards: only about 25% of gastroenterology applicants succeed 5.
The official numbers are less frightening than the reputation. The Divisional Written was 73.8% (n=925) in February 2026 against a five-year mean of 78% 1; the Divisional Clinical was 83.0% (n=997) in 2026 2. You get four attempts at the written for 2023-onward cohorts inside an eight-year basic-training window, and three at the clinical 12. Two exams, once, halfway through — most colleges make you sit more.
Getting in is not the hard part either. Queensland's 2027-year intake took 242 of 309 applicants, about 78% 3. WA interviews a maximum of three candidates per place and Monash says roughly the same 3. The bottleneck is downstream: advanced training. Gastroenterology reports roughly 25% of applicants succeeding 5.
So what is people actually complaining about? The job. Being the med reg is the hospital's default answer to every problem, so a badly staffed hospital breaks its BPTs first 6. Add nights, MET and stroke calls at PGY3, exam study on top, and jurisdictions that now start you at PGY3 on a three-year contract 4 — and the cost lands squarely in the years when people are having children. That is where most of the "hellscape" posts come from, and the sub says so openly 6.
The counter-argument the threads upvote most. None of that is unique to BPT; it is louder because there are more BPTs, and because the med reg is the most visible dishevelled person in the building 6. Rotation quality and hospital culture explain more of the variance than the program does.
The honest read for a PGY2: pick the network for its staffing and its written pass rate, not its brand, and decide before BPT1 whether you actually want the advanced training at the end — that is the competitive step, not this one 5.
r/ausjdocs — community view, not policy; verbatim, cautionary beside positive where both exist, every quote linked to the comment.
My wife is an incredibly hard worker and she's just quit BPT.
No, exams suck and sometimes the job gets very busy. Occasionally there is some politics. None of these are uniquely BPT problems
BPTs are the canary of dysfunctional hospitals - since 'call the med reg' is the knee jerk response of almost every other specialty, any hospital which is overworked will overwork the BPTs first, generally.
You also only have to sit the one set of the exams halfway through your training and you're done.
the exam hellscape/overworking/shit work life balance is something that you'll encounter in pretty much every specialty. This isn't unique to BPT/AT.
Asked 4 times on r/ausjdocs (title-regex count) · encoded by hand from the numbered sources, retrieved 12 Sept 2026; no AI wrote any of it. how the count was made
asked_count = posts in the r/ausjdocs dump (19,145 posts, 2022-09-13 to 2026-09-12) whose title matches /\bBPT\b.{0,50}(hell|bad|worth|awful|misery|toxic|brutal)|(hell|worth|awful).{0,30}\bBPT\b/i. Quotes are the top-scoring comments in the two 'is BPT that bad' threads, deliberately balanced: the two strongest 'it's not unique to BPT' answers against the two strongest accounts of why people leave.