← all questions · Medical students
Only if it becomes a publication with your name first, and only if it is still inside the college's window when you apply. RANZCOG counts first-author papers from the previous five years and caps all research at 3 of 48 points 1. RANZCO caps secondary authorship at 0.5 points total 2. Being author six of eight is worth nothing.
The rubrics score the paper, not when you wrote it. No college asks whether you were a student. A PubMed-indexed first-author paper written in fourth year scores exactly what the same paper scores if you write it as an SRMO — which is the real argument for starting early, because you have more time now than you ever will again.
Two things kill student papers, though. The first is the clock. RANZCOG only counts publications "published in the previous five years prior to application" 1. If you publish in second year and apply at PGY5, it has expired. The second is authorship order. RANZCOG requires first author or first co-author, full stop 1. RANZCO pays 2 points for first or last author in a journal with an impact factor over 4, 1 point in a lesser journal, and 0.25 for secondary authorship capped at 0.5 across the whole category 2. Getting added to the end of a registrar's paper is worth a quarter point.
And the ceilings are low. RANZCOG's entire research section is 3 points out of 48, and you can score the PhD section or the publications section, never both 1. RANZCO's research maximum is 4 points, against 6 for ophthalmic clinical experience 2. Research does not win you a place; a thin research section loses you one.
What to actually do with a year of med school. One project, finished, with you driving it, supervised by someone who answers emails. The sub is consistent that the supervisor is the variable that decides whether a project ever becomes a paper 3, that a real project reads differently from an audit you did once 4, and that if you have no idea what specialty you want, this is a bad use of your only free years 35. That last one is the honest counter-argument: most med-school research is picked before you know the specialty, and the specialty is what decides whether it scores.
r/ausjdocs — community view, not policy; verbatim, cautionary beside positive where both exist, every quote linked to the comment.
Please just enjoy your free time for Pete's sake. Worry about research when you're set on a specialty and your research can actually bank you CV points.
Go with the one that has the more supportive and actually involved supervisor
Ask those on your team, email the person at uni who is responsible for each subject
Yes, not so relevant for intern jobs, but training programs love people with real research skills/experience (as opposed to 'I did an audit once').
Asked 12 times on r/ausjdocs (title-regex count) · encoded by hand from the numbered sources, retrieved 12 Sept 2026; no AI wrote any of it. how the count was made
asked_count = posts in r_ausjdocs_posts.jsonl (19,145 posts, 2022-09-13 to 2026-09-12) whose title matches /research.{0,45}(med (school|student)|before (internship|graduat)|undergrad)|(med (school|student)|undergrad).{0,35}research/i. Quotes are the highest-scoring comments in the med-student research threads, chosen to set the 'colleges love real research' view against the 'do it once you know your specialty' view, plus the practical answer on how people actually find a project.