← all questions · CV and cover letters
Yes, in a separate "in progress" section with the date — never as complete. Dermatology has a dedicated study-in-progress section requiring enrolment evidence 1. Scoring is a different matter: RANZCO scores an incomplete degree at zero 2, orthopaedics requires the doctorate awarded by a fixed date 3.
Declaring it is allowed and often required. Dermatology's application has a Study in Progress section for courses under way, requiring a transcript or evidence of enrolment, plus a separate section where incomplete qualifications must be declared with reasons — and things completed but not yet formally awarded go in that section, not under qualifications 1. So the honest answer is not "leave it off", it is "put it in the right box".
Whether it scores is a different question, and mostly it does not. RANZCO scores an incomplete PhD or masters at zero 2. Orthopaedics requires a doctorate to be complete by a stated date in the selection year 3. Dermatology will not consider a publication awaiting acceptance, and an acceptance that arrives after the closing date does not count; presentations accepted but not yet delivered are excluded too 1. The exceptions are worth knowing: urology scores a part-finished doctorate — 4 points for a pre-submission thesis review, 2 for confirmation of candidature 4 — and vascular gives 1 point for twelve months full-time towards a higher degree 5.
Label it precisely. The convention on the sub is to list the item with "pending" and the booked date so it reads as locked in rather than aspirational 6. For papers, "in press" once accepted, and "submitted" only if you are comfortable being asked about it 7.
Do not round up. Dermatology's policy treats misleading information as grounds for refusing an offer regardless of rank, and says it may result in a lifelong ban on future applications 1. A course you attend in November is worth less than the fifteen seconds it takes a panel to notice you called it complete in July.
r/ausjdocs — community view, not policy; verbatim, cautionary beside positive where both exist, every quote linked to the comment.
If it has only been submitted you can put (submitted), but it's a bit cheeky.
I say yes. I usually put a specific date after it, to show you're locked in, not just 'thinking about it'
I always wrote what the reference would look like if it were published minus which journal.
I add them, but put *pending* and the course date next to it until I've done the course.
Asked 2 times on r/ausjdocs (title-regex count) · encoded by hand from the numbered sources, retrieved 12 Sept 2026; no AI wrote any of it. how the count was made
asked_count = posts in r_ausjdocs_posts.jsonl (19,145 posts, 2022-09-13 to 2026-09-12) whose title matches /(sign(ed)? up|enrol|booked|registered|not (yet )?complet|upcoming|in progress|haven.?t (done|completed)|pending).{0,55}(course|exam|qualification|\bCV\b)|(course|exam).{0,45}(not (yet )?complet|sign(ed)? up|haven.?t)/i. Quotes are every substantive answer in the one on-point thread plus the two clearest conventions from the pending-publication thread.